Taxpayer Funding for Stem Cell Research

It’s important that you let your reps know what you think on the vote for ‘Taxpayer Funding for Stem Cell Research’ ASAP. According to the email I received “70% of messages on this topic thus far are in favor.”
Thank you for using Mail System

Keep these tidbits in mind: 1) Bush has promised to veto the bill. It will be his FIRST during his tenure as president. 2) Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, a transplant surgeon, said “We’ve got to work together to allow science to advance” and 3) The House last year fell 50 votes short of a veto-proof margin when it passed the same bill, 238-194. Contact your reps!

I contacted the CT peeps and W…
Representative DeLauro
Senator Dodd
Senator Lieberman
Mr. President
Message text follows:

Gary Ploski
P.O. Box 7245
Prospect, CT 06712-0245

July 18, 2006

[recipient address was inserted here]

[recipient name was inserted here],

America is falling behind the rest of the world with stem cell research
and is losing many of it’s scientists to other countries with less
restrictions. We need to keep the research and the researchers here.
Foreign research is proving that use of stem cells is a viable method of
treatment. It is time to open the doors further to domestic research

Gary Ploski


Bush Promises Veto of Stem Cell Bill
Jul 17 6:27 PM US/Eastern

Associated Press Writer


In an emotional session marked by tales of death and hope, the Senate debated on Monday whether the government should pay for new embryonic stem cell research, pushing a measure to do it toward passage and President Bush’s first veto.

“He would veto the bill,” the White House declared in a written statement, underlining the words for emphasis.

That quieted speculation by supporters that Bush, perhaps persuaded by new science and strong public support for embryonic stem cell research, would reverse course and sign the legislation into law.

Though several Republican Senate leaders support the measure, many GOP lawmakers oppose it, as do conservative voters in a midterm election year.

“The bill would compel all American taxpayers to pay for research that relies on the intentional destruction of human embryos for the derivation of stem cells, overturning the president’s policy that funds research without promoting such ongoing destruction,” the White House said.

Behind the scenes, former first lady Nancy Reagan lobbied lawmakers on the bill’s behalf. Her husband, President Reagan, died in 2004 after a long deterioration from Alzheimer’s disease, one of several illnesses that researchers say stem cell research might eventually cure.

“She is still restless on this issue,” said Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D- Mass. “We all know this debate has moved further down the road toward a hopeful conclusion because of her work.”

Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., a cancer survivor, said his disease is one of many that might be cured sooner with the engine of federal funding behind embryonic stem cell research.

Specter compared opposition to the bill to historical resistance to research that led to space travel and landmark vaccinations “to show how attitudes at different times in retrospect look foolish, look absolutely ridiculous.”

“There is just no sensible, logical reason why we would not make use of stem cell research,” he said.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, a transplant surgeon whose negotiations permitted the bill to come to the floor after being stalled for a year, attributed the opposition to “fear (that) can also delay scientific advances that are out there before us.”

“We’ve got to work together to allow science to advance” within ethical boundaries, he said.

Where to draw those boundaries is the heart of the debate.

Bush and his allies believe embryos are nascent human life worth more than the advances they might make through stem cell science and point out that embryonic stem cell research is years away from clinical trials, let alone cures for disease. They rejected arguments that only leftover embryos from fertility clinics would be used.

“Just because the budding lives would not survive does not mean that we should ghoulishly conduct experiments on them,” said Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky. “Who knows how many human embryos we will have to destroy before any tangible progress is made?”

Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., appeared with three children adopted from in vitro fertilization clinics in an effort to put faces on the argument that frozen embryos could have a future other than being subjects of stem cell research.

“It is immoral to destroy the youngest of human lives for research purposes,” Brownback said. “It is an age-old human debate, whether you allow the stronger to take advantage of the weaker. We have already regretted doing it in the past; we will regret this, too.”

Neither house has demonstrated the two-thirds majority needed to override a presidential veto. Vote counters on both sides said they expected the Senate to pass the bill with at least 60 votes, but they could not predict there would be the required 67 for a veto override.

The House last year fell 50 votes short of a veto-proof margin when it passed the same bill, 238-194.

The Senate was slated to vote Tuesday afternoon. Bush was expected to veto the bill early Wednesday, followed by the House’s override effort.

Two related bills also are scheduled for votes Tuesday in both the House and Senate. One, sponsored by Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., would encourage study on stem cells derived from sources other than embryos. The other, sponsored by Santorum and Brownback, would ban so-called “fetal farming,” the possibility of developing fetuses, then aborting them for scientific research.

Both have little or no opposition and Bush is expected to sign them.

On the Net:

Information on the bill, H.R. 810, S. 3504 and S. 2754, may be found at



  1. Media UnCut - Stem Cell Bill to be vetoed.... Stem Cell research could bring hope to curing diseases that millions of American’s have…

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *